Latest Updates: stats RSS

  • A billion here, A billion there....

    j_ling 2:41 pm on November 18, 2009 | 2 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , stats

    Being a very visual learner, I’m always on the hunt for great con­cepts that enable me to pic­ture sit­u­a­tions bet­ter. I came across David McCan­d­less Infor­ma­tion is Beau­ti­ful blog where ideas, knowl­edge, issues, data are visu­al­ized and he does a heck of a job! He cov­ers a wide range of inter­est­ing top­ics, some which I per­son­ally find very amus­ing. ie. plane sta­tis­tics — how to improve your chances of sur­viv­ing, time travel in movies, cor­re­la­tion of eco­nom­ics and happy marriages.

    The visual below is a com­par­a­tive con­cept of the bil­lions that have been spent in our time.

    The orig­i­nal post ( and larger/clearer ver­sion of the pic­ture) can be found here.

     
  • 10 ideas that are changing our world right now!

    j_ling 4:24 pm on November 7, 2009 | 0 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , stats

    As my time in the last month or so has been pre-dominantly con­sumed by prep­ping and par­tic­i­pat­ing in a busi­ness case com­pe­ti­tion in Texas, I found my read­ing list to be nar­rowed down to database/news/papers/reports on cur­rent mar­ket trends, the eco­nom­ics of emerg­ing mar­kets and [insert topic of case research here].

    What I did come across in my mean­der­ings across the inter­webs was this [recent-ish] issue of the TIME’s mag­a­zine, which high­lights “10 ideas that are chang­ing our world right now”. The com­piled list of ranged from issues in reli­gion to infra­struc­ture to the econ­omy, one of which I found to be of par­tic­u­lar inter­est to me.

    Africa: Open for Business

    The arti­cle high­lights that Africa has long been per­ceived as a con­ti­nent of where progress is irrel­e­vant regard­less of the efforts being done — for­eign aid, eco­nomic stim­u­lus, etc. Africa is essen­tially viewed as hope­less, and a $40 billion/yr for­eign indus­try has been built around that per­cep­tion to the point where peo­ple are start­ing to ques­tion whether aid is even doing any good at all. Thus, when the world’s econ­omy went into Def­con 5 last year, the $40 bil­lion indus­try started being called into ques­tion with debates and books being writ­ten that for­eign aid is bad, fuels cor­rup­tion, under­mines gov­ern­ments, unsus­tain­able and is  counter pro­duc­tive. (ie. Dead Aid — Dambisa Moyo, for­mer Gold­man Sachs and World Bank economist)

    Drilling down to the actual rel­e­vancy of aid and devel­op­ment, the arti­cle points out the obvi­ous fact that has been star­ing us in the face all this time. That through­out the noise of the aid indus­try, real­ity is that aid is no longer Africa’s main source of for­eign income. Yes, that’s right. Africa is now a busi­ness destination.

    So, I did some eco­nomic dig­ging and cam across some very inter­est­ing information.

    1) For­eign Direct Invest­ment (FDI)  inflows into Africa have improved tremen­dously in the last 6 years. From $14.6 bil­lion in 2002 to $53 bil­lion in 2007 (UNCTAD World Invest­ment Report, 2008). This trans­lates into a 263% growth rate over a 6 year period!

    Note: FDI refers to invest­ment in domes­tic struc­tures, equip­ment and orga­ni­za­tion by for­eign pri­vate sec­tors or gov­ern­ments. Does not include for­eign port­fo­lio invest­ment in a domes­tic econ­omy. FDI con­tributes to the eco­nomic per­for­mance of a host coun­try by: first,representing addi­tional resources which can be used to build addi­tional phys­i­cal cap­i­tal and cre­ate more employ­ment. Sec­ondly, increases a country’s out­put and pro­duc­tiv­ity by encour­ag­ing effi­cient use of exist­ing resources by increas­ing the size of the cap­i­tal stock. Over­all, FDI also improves local skills and tech­nol­ogy know-hows which trans­late into growth and development.

    The IMF puts Africa’s aver­age annual growth for 2004 to ’08 at more than 6% — bet­ter than any devel­oped econ­omy — and pre­dicts the con­ti­nent will buck the global reces­sion­ary trend to grow nearly 3.3% this year — Time Magazine

    2) The rea­son for an increase in FDI is an improve­ment in both eco­nomic and polit­i­cal con­di­tions on the continent.

    Eco­nomic Con­di­tions: The UNCTAD Report stated that not only has Africa’s econ­omy grown over 5%/yr since 2001, but cross bor­der M&A’s in the extrac­tion and related ser­vice indus­tries of Africa has tripled. Com­bined with the fact that the high prices and demand for resources like oil has attracted invest­ments from both devel­oped and devel­op­ing coun­tries. An inter­est­ing fact to note is that because Africa’s econ­omy is rel­a­tively dis­placed from the global econ­omy, it is actu­ally to their advan­tage dur­ing the cur­rent eco­nomic cri­sis, that they have been rel­a­tively unaffected.

    Per­haps the most attrac­tive ele­ment of the improv­ing African eco­nomic con­di­tion is the very fact that China has devel­oped a healthy inter­est in the continent.

    While the old super­pow­ers still ago­nize over Africa’s poverty, the new one is cap­ti­vated by its riches. Trade between Africa and China has grown an aver­age of 30% in the past decade, top­ping $106 bil­lion last year. — Time Magazine

    The Chi­nese has changed the psy­cho­log­i­cal approach on Africa. They enter the con­ti­nent to trade, not to pro­vide aid. In her book, Dead Aid, Dambisa Moyo pointed out that those who still needs con­vinc­ing about Africa should ask them­selves if they are con­vinced about China, “because if you back China, you’re back­ing Africa.”

    Polit­i­cal Con­di­tions: The turn of the new mil­len­nium has brought about a wave of peace, with a rapid decline in civil wars and con­flicts. Democ­racy is up, trade is improv­ing, infla­tion is declin­ing and growth is hap­pen­ing. Yes Africa still has its Zim­bab­wes, Dar­furs and Con­gos, but the truth of the mat­ter is, the con­ti­nent is trend­ing towards a more peace­ful and demo­c­ra­tic region as a pow­er­ful con­sen­sus is emerg­ing across Africa for good gov­er­nance and as nearly all African coun­tries have been involved in some type of polit­i­cal and insti­tu­tional change.

    This is reflected by the fact that bet­ter gov­er­nance means bet­ter stan­dards of liv­ing, infra­struc­ture, edu­ca­tion and although most Africans are not mid­dle class, most are also not liv­ing in extreme poverty.

    The per­cent­age of Africans liv­ing on $1.25 a day or less dropped from 59% to 51% from 1996 to 2005 and has decreased fur­ther since — World Bank

    For those who are curi­ous, the full list is:

    1. Jobs are the new Assets

    2. Recy­cling the Suburbs

    3. The New Calvinism

    4. Rein­stat­ing the Interstate

    5. Amor­tal­ity

    6. Africa, Busi­ness Destination

    7. Rent-A-County

    8. BioBanks

    9. Sur­vival Stores

    10. Eco­log­i­cal Intelligence

    The TIMES’s arti­cle can be found here

     
  • Review: The Munk Debates

    j_ling 10:42 pm on June 29, 2009 | 3 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , foreign aid, , stats

    “We need com­pas­sion to get our­selves started, and enlight­ened self-interest to get our­selves seri­ous … that’s the alliance that changes the world” Paul Col­lier

    “Evi­dence over­whelm­ingly demon­strates that aid to Africa has made the poor poorer, and the growth slower. ” Dambisa Moyo

    “Unless there is recog­ni­tion that women are most vul­ner­a­ble… and you do some­thing about social and cul­tural equal­ity for women, you’re never going to defeat this pan­demic.” Stephen Lewis

    ***

    I absolutely love the con­cept of bring­ing together ideas, as I think it is one of the most vital plat­forms in which we can learn and grow from one another. Con­sider The Munk Debates, a remark­able debate series that I followed/am fol­low­ing that brings together promi­nent lead­ers to debate about major issues con­cern­ing the world and Canada.  It is one of the few plat­forms that brings together the opin­ions of promi­nent peo­ple and places them head to head against each other and see how they fare. The model of this debate also works around the fact that the debate is sub­ject to pub­lic scrutiny and opinion.

    In terms of organ­i­sa­tion, they have been wise in their selec­tion of debaters. ie. Stephen Lewis — pretty much a Cana­dian icon, or con­tro­ver­sial writ­ers like Dambisa Moyo that would really draw the audi­ence to par­tic­i­pate and con­sider the topic of choice. The cho­sen top­ics are also well timed, the first one set just before the US pres­i­den­tial elec­tions in Novem­ber 2008, urg­ing the pub­lic to con­sider global secu­rity in light of the elections.

    So, if you haven’t been fol­low­ing the debates (There is one every 6 months), here are three rea­sons why (aside from the usual expo­sure to new ideas):

    1) It’s FREE

    The organ­is­ers have done an amaz­ing job mak­ing the debates acces­si­ble online. The debates are streamed live, can be re-watched, audio, mp3, read the debate tran­script, etc. Did I men­tion that its all free? Enough said. Watch!

    2) SAVES you time

    There are few places online that you are able to find Stephen Lewis, Paul Col­lier, Dambisa Moyo, Mia Far­row, John Bolton’s, etc. opin­ions all in one place. All of them are extremely influ­en­tial and respected indi­vid­u­als in their respec­tive fields and it’s a one stop/click/video for amaz­ing insights into dif­fer­ent top­ics. It also enables you to see their posi­tions on cer­tain top­ics, which would help you greatly in terms of referring/researching on a topic/individual should you want to inves­ti­gate in more depth their pub­li­ca­tions and opinions.

    3) COMMENT on your position

    For a cer­tain period after the debates, an online pol­ing sta­tion (open to a ran­dom selct group of Cana­dian pan­elist) and medi­ated forum (open to the gen­eral pub­lic) is set up. You get to see and com­ment on an ‘opin­ions forum’, and some­times you find some of the most amaz­ing ideas and posi­tions that the pub­lic has taken on it. A data analy­sis is also run based on the online pol­ing sta­tion and you can see the break­down of opin­ion on the debate topic as well as the key points that are brought up dur­ing the debate.

    In other words, you watch the debates, com­ment, and view stats. Love it.

    ***
    Past debate topics:

    ***

    ***

    ***

    Some future debate topic lineups:

    Reli­gion is a force of good in the world

    More Free mar­ket and less gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tion is the answer to our eco­nomic woes

    Final thoughts: Ranked: 9/10. Improve­ment: Bet­ter adver­tis­ing. I only found this after nav­i­gat­ing heav­ily through the Globe and Mail.

    Note: All pic­tures are taken from http://www.munkdebates.com

     
  • On Human Trafficking

    j_ling 2:00 pm on June 26, 2009 | 0 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , stats,

    Today I’m writ­ing about some­thing a lit­tle closer to the heart: Malaysia
    Recently, the U.S. State Depart­ment in its annual Traf­fick­ing in Per­sons Report 2009 (page 197) down­graded Malaysia from Tier 2 to Tier 3, black­list­ing it world­wide along with 16 other coun­ties for not enforc­ing human traf­fick­ing laws. Malaysia cur­rently joins other black­listed coun­tries such as Saudi Ara­bia, Sudan, Syria, Niger and Burma.
    Cambodian Thailand border childrenMalaysia has been fac­ing con­stant scrutiny for its lack of regard of the abuse and exploita­tion of migrant work­ers and has had its rank­ing hov­er­ing between Tier 2 and 3 for the last 10 years. In 2001, it was black­listed, but improved its rank­ing to Tier 2 for the fol­low­ing years. How­ever, in 2007, it was down­graded once again to Tier 2, and in 2008, after the enact­ment of the Anti-Trafficking in Per­sons Act 2007, Malaysia regained its sta­tus as a Tier 2 country.
    Tier 3 coun­tries face pos­si­ble sanc­tions such as the with­hold­ing of non-humanitarian, non-trade related U.S. aid and fund­ing for gov­ern­ment offi­cials to par­tic­i­pate in edu­ca­tional and cul­tural exchange programs.
    As a response to the down­grade, two new divi­sions have been estab­lished under the Home Min­istry. They are the Inter­na­tional Divi­sion and the Research, Devel­op­ment and Mon­i­tor­ing Division.
    ***
    This is my HOPE to my country:
    That we would address this issue with the respect and the seri­ous­ness that it deserves — the effec­tive­ness of long-term pre­ven­tion and improve­ment requires a com­mit­ment to reforms, poli­cies and Acts.
    ***
    • The Inter­na­tional Labor Orga­ni­za­tion (ILO)—the United Nations agency charged with address­ing labor stan­dards, employ­ment, and social pro­tec­tion issues—estimates that there are at least 12.3 mil­lion adults and chil­dren in forced labor, bonded labor, and com­mer­cial sex­ual servi­tude at any given time.
    • Of these vic­tims, the ILO esti­mates that at least 1.39 mil­lion are vic­tims of com­mer­cial sex­ual servi­tude, both transna­tional and within coun­tries. Accord­ing to the ILO, 56 per­cent of all forced labor vic­tims are women and girls.
    Image from Google images: http://vietnameseworkersabroad.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/human-wrists1.jpg

    ***

    “The root causes of migra­tion and traf­fick­ing greatly over­lap. The lack of rights afforded to women serves as the pri­mary causative fac­tor at the root of both women’s migra­tions and traf­fick­ing in women…By fail­ure to pro­tect and pro­mote women’s civil, polit­i­cal, eco­nomic and social rights, gov­ern­ments cre­ate sit­u­a­tions in which traf­fick­ing flourishes.”
    Rad­hika Coomaraswamy, UN Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on Vio­lence Against Women

    ***

    Sources/Further Read­ing:

    http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=47332http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Wednesday/National/2590572/Article/index_html
    http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/123357.pdf

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel