Latest Updates: motivation RSS

  • (No)Where // (Now)Here

    11:59 am on November 28, 2011 | 2 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , motivation, ,

    Just dis­cov­ered an incred­i­ble pho­tog­ra­pher and his web­site: 365q.ca. Thought I would share a cou­ple of my favourite pic­tures I find inspir­ing. Enjoy!

     
  • Aspirational Writing

    6:54 pm on August 13, 2011 | 1 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: motivation, ,

     

    Writing

    You write in order to change the world…. The world changes accord­ing to the way peo­ple see it, and if you alter, even by a mil­lime­ter, the way peo­ple look at real­ity, then you can change it.” –James Baldwin

     
  • Why I Believe in Social Entrepreneurship

    12:46 am on August 1, 2011 | 0 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , motivation, ,

    Have you ever been asked a ques­tion that sim­ply stops you in your tracks…creating that lump in your throat that results in you awk­wardly star­ing at a per­son for what seems like eter­nity (but really was only per­haps 30s)? I have. It wasn’t that the ques­tion that was unex­pected. Only my response. I thought the answer would be at the tip of my tongue, ready to pro­vide that sweet ele­va­tor pitch… but my words splut­tered and died before I had a chance to arrange them into coher­ent thoughts.

    The ques­tion that caused this sur­pris­ing reac­tion was: why do you believe in social entrepreneurship?

    My brain raced through the rea­sons, each rea­son fol­lowed by what seemed like a giant red sign that screamed CLICHE.

    I believe in a human cen­tred mar­ket based solu­tion to poverty. Cliche.

    I believe in mak­ing the world a bet­ter place and leav­ing it bet­ter than when I’ve found it. Cliche.

    My back­ground and jour­ney has led me to believe in the power of entre­pre­neur­ship. Cliche.

    I come from a fam­ily whose lives have been changed through entre­pre­neur­ship. Cliche.

    I stum­bled into this field unknow­ingly. Cliche.

    Social entre­pre­neurs are the key in unlock­ing the levers of change. Cliche.

    Entre­pre­neurs have the abil­ity to cre­ate and imag­ine. With sup­port and direc­tion, they can be the change we wish to see in this world. Cliche.

    In my head, my emo­tions quickly churned from alarm to frus­tra­tion. Why was it that I couldn’t explain my Why? Was it because I didn’t under­stand my rea­sons, or per­haps was it because I couldn’t find the words to say? Why do these rea­sons seem cliche? Per­haps peo­ple have overused them and they have lost their meaning…and then the ques­tion becomes: how do you do then con­vey any one of those rea­sons with sin­cere belief? After all, how can you cap­ture pas­sion and belief in 30 sec­onds. In a para­graph even. It doesn’t seem to even do it justice.

    About a year ago, I wrote a post on the beauty of imag­i­na­tion. Although I still believe this rea­son to be true, I couldn’t quite get the rea­son of imag­i­na­tion to fit within the social enterprise/international devel­op­ment piece of my beliefs. It seemed to be miss­ing a piece.

    Truth be told, I was then sud­denly mes­mer­ized by the fact that per­haps, just per­haps my rea­son WAS the com­bi­na­tion of all those cliches. And more. After all, isn’t our under­stand­ing of the world a lim­i­ta­tion of what we have expe­ri­enced and inher­ited knowl­edge? Maybe my pas­sion is a com­bi­na­tion of a math­e­mat­i­cal sequence of expe­ri­ences (I like to think so!):

    1) I grew up painfully aware of poverty and socio-economic oppression

    2) My family’s story changed because of entrepreneurship

    3) Hard work and a stranger’s faith in see­ing my poten­tial allowed me to con­tinue my edu­ca­tion in Canada

    4) I unknow­ingly stum­bled into this field through a “less-than-perfect” vol­un­teer pro­gram through my university

    5) Tip­ping point: Work­ing with a women’s group in Lesotho ignited an under­stand­ing that iden­ti­fy­ing change levers in a com­mu­nity can change lives

    6) Through­out busi­ness school, I have devel­oped a nat­ural bias towards a mar­ket based solu­tion to solv­ing problems.

    There­fore: 7) Giv­ing peo­ple the oppor­tu­nity (just like it has been given to me) to cre­ate and imag­ine a bet­ter life is the key to cre­at­ing a bet­ter world. A human-centered mar­ket based solution.

    Social entre­pre­neur­ship shakes up our com­pla­cen­cies by chal­leng­ing how we place value on social and eco­nomic urgen­cies. It spins us round in two ways at once: it shows us the sights and social val­ues that we might ordi­nar­ily ignore; but it also, and more deeply, shows us parts of cap­i­tal­ism that have grown rusty and need changing.

    So what is my answer you might ask? For now, I will have to set­tle for a com­bi­na­tion of cliche answers, my sequence of expe­ri­ences and that nag­ging voice at the of my head telling me that it is the right thing to believe in.

    I’ll be sure to check in with my answer again as my under­stand­ing of the world con­tin­ues to grow!

     
  • Being a smarter human vs. Being a better person

    10:00 am on July 9, 2011 | 0 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: motivation,

    Wittgen­stein made the won­der­fully enig­matic remark: “I work quite dili­gently and wish that I were bet­ter and smarter.  And these both are one and the same.”  Really?  One and the same thing – being a smarter human being and a bet­ter person?

    I am, of course, aware that mod­ern transat­lantic usage has drowned the dis­tinc­tion between ‘being good’ as a moral qual­ity and ‘being well’ as a com­ment on a person’s health (no aches and pains, fine blood pres­sure, and so on), and have long ceased wor­ry­ing about the man­i­fest immod­esty of those of my friends who, when asked how they are, reply with appar­ent self-praise, ‘I am very good.’  But Wittgen­stein was not an Amer­i­can, and 1917 was well before the con­quest of the world by vibrant Amer­i­can usage.  When Wittgen­stein said that being ‘bet­ter’ and being ‘smarter’ were ‘one and the same thing’, he must have been mak­ing a sub­stan­tial assertion.

    Under­ly­ing the point may be the recog­ni­tion, in some form, that many acts of nas­ti­ness are com­mit­ted by peo­ple who are deluded, in one way or another, about the sub­ject.  Lack of smart­ness can cer­tainly be one source of moral fail­ing in good behav­iour.  Reflect­ing on what would really be a smart thing to do can some­times help one act bet­ter towards oth­ers. That this can eas­ily be the case has been brought out very clearly by mod­ern game the­ory.  Among the pru­den­tial rea­sons for good behav­iour may well be one’s own gain from such behav­iour. Indeed, there could be great gain for all mem­bers of a group by fol­low­ing rules of good behav­iour which can help every­one.  It is not par­tic­u­larly smart for a group of peo­ple to act in a way that ruins them all.

    But maybe that is not what Wittgen­stein meant.  Being smarter can also give us the abil­ity to think more clearly about our goals, objec­tives and val­ues. If self-interest is, ulti­mately, a prim­i­tive thought (despite the com­plex­i­ties just men­tioned), clar­ity about the more sophis­ti­cated pri­or­i­ties and oblig­a­tions that we would want to cher­ish and pur­sue would tend to depend on our power of rea­son­ing. A per­son may have well-thought-out rea­sons other than the pro­mo­tion of per­sonal gain for act­ing in a socially decent way.”

    - Amartya Sen, The Idea of Justice

     

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel