Updates from April, 2010

  • Review: UBC iWeek Global Keynote Speaker- Paul Rusesabagina (Hotel Rwanda)

    j_ling 3:20 pm on April 9, 2010 | 1 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,

    A cou­ple weeks ago, I attended a very inter­est­ing event, one that pro­voked two thoughts:

    1) There is always, always two sides of a story and

    2) We need to use resources around us — beyond what we have at hand in order to learn

    This event was in UBC as part of the Inter­na­tional Week celebrations:

    To pro­vide some back­ground: (Taken from event description)

    Mr. Paul Rus­esabag­ina was the man­ager of the Sabena Hôtel des Mille Collines, and shel­tered hun­dreds of Tut­sis and mod­er­ate Hutus peo­ple for a hun­dred days using all avail­able resources to him.  His coura­geous efforts thwarted bands of geno­ci­dal mili­tia while Rwanda descended into out­right geno­cide and civil war, and was cel­e­brated in the Hol­ly­wood movie pro­duc­tion, “Hotel Rwanda”.

    A recip­i­ent of numer­ous inter­na­tional awards, includ­ing the Wal­len­berg Medal and the Pres­i­den­tial Medal of Free­dom, Mr. Rus­esabag­ina is a pow­er­ful speaker with a story of hero­ism and human­ity in inhu­mane con­di­tions.  In addi­tion to his expe­ri­ences dur­ing and after the Rwan­dan geno­cide, Mr. Rus­esabag­ina will share his insights into the nature of the con­flict, the fail­ure of the West to stop it, and the chal­lenges of reconciliation.

    The event started out with a quick intro­duc­tion by Brian Sul­li­van and quickly pro­ceeded to Paul Rusesabagina’s speech itself. I won’t go into details of the speech, which was an account of his expe­ri­ences of the Rwan­dan geno­cide and what went down in Hotel Rwanda. It was incred­i­ble hear­ing his accounts first hand, but the real expe­ri­ence cam dur­ing the Q&A period. Prof. Michael Byers was the mod­er­a­tor for the session.

    Three things occured dur­ing the Q&A that took me com­pletely by surprise:

    1) There was a sub­stan­tial amount of peo­ple that are Rwan­dan geno­cide refugees that were present. I had no idea that event of this event man­aged to reach past the UBC com­mu­nity, which was impressive.

    2) The ques­tions regard­ing com­par­isons of South Africa and Rwanda’s econ­omy was very much unex­pected, con­sid­er­ing the dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal, cul­tural and eco­nomic con­di­tions of both countries.

    3) The response towards Paul Rusesabagina’s speech was cen­tered around his account­abil­ity and actions of Hotel Rwanda.

    Need­less to say, due to time con­straints, only 3–4 ques­tions were answered and the ses­sion ended. How­ever, sev­eral Rwan­dan com­mu­nity rep­re­sen­ta­tives spoke up on their ver­sion of Paul Rusesabagina’s actions, ques­tion­ing his motives, finan­cial account­abil­ity as well as alliances dur­ing the geno­cide. They had the Chan Cen­tre riv­eted with accounts of their per­sonal sto­ries of their sur­vival and encoun­ters with the military.

    I have been to numer­ous events at the Chan but this was the first one that I have ever expe­ri­enced such a strong out­come and dis­cus­sion after. Stu­dents were gath­er­ing out­side the Chan around these Rwan­dan geno­cide sur­vivors who were engag­ing in more per­sonal con­ver­sa­tion about their expe­ri­ences and there was buzz in the atmos­phere about new­found knowledge.

    My Main Take­away: Paul Rus­esabag­ina has been potrayed by Hol­ly­wood as a hero and revered for his coura­geous efforts dur­ing the geno­cide. How­ever, the dis­cus­sion at the Chan cen­ter which ques­tioned his alliances, finan­cial account­abil­ity, and actual self-preservation efforts. This  has made me realise that there are always two sides to a story, no mat­ter how well know one side is. It is our respon­si­bil­ity to always be aware of the other side.

    I leave you with a phe­nom­e­nal TED talk by Chi­ma­manda Adiechi telling the dan­ger of a sin­gle story. Because our lives and cul­tures are com­posed of many over­lap­ping stories, if we hear only a sin­gle story about another per­son or coun­try, we risk a crit­i­cal misunderstanding.

     
  • Review: The Munk Debates

    j_ling 10:42 pm on June 29, 2009 | 3 comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , foreign aid, ,

    “We need com­pas­sion to get our­selves started, and enlight­ened self-interest to get our­selves seri­ous … that’s the alliance that changes the world” Paul Col­lier

    “Evi­dence over­whelm­ingly demon­strates that aid to Africa has made the poor poorer, and the growth slower. ” Dambisa Moyo

    “Unless there is recog­ni­tion that women are most vul­ner­a­ble… and you do some­thing about social and cul­tural equal­ity for women, you’re never going to defeat this pan­demic.” Stephen Lewis

    ***

    I absolutely love the con­cept of bring­ing together ideas, as I think it is one of the most vital plat­forms in which we can learn and grow from one another. Con­sider The Munk Debates, a remark­able debate series that I followed/am fol­low­ing that brings together promi­nent lead­ers to debate about major issues con­cern­ing the world and Canada.  It is one of the few plat­forms that brings together the opin­ions of promi­nent peo­ple and places them head to head against each other and see how they fare. The model of this debate also works around the fact that the debate is sub­ject to pub­lic scrutiny and opinion.

    In terms of organ­i­sa­tion, they have been wise in their selec­tion of debaters. ie. Stephen Lewis — pretty much a Cana­dian icon, or con­tro­ver­sial writ­ers like Dambisa Moyo that would really draw the audi­ence to par­tic­i­pate and con­sider the topic of choice. The cho­sen top­ics are also well timed, the first one set just before the US pres­i­den­tial elec­tions in Novem­ber 2008, urg­ing the pub­lic to con­sider global secu­rity in light of the elections.

    So, if you haven’t been fol­low­ing the debates (There is one every 6 months), here are three rea­sons why (aside from the usual expo­sure to new ideas):

    1) It’s FREE

    The organ­is­ers have done an amaz­ing job mak­ing the debates acces­si­ble online. The debates are streamed live, can be re-watched, audio, mp3, read the debate tran­script, etc. Did I men­tion that its all free? Enough said. Watch!

    2) SAVES you time

    There are few places online that you are able to find Stephen Lewis, Paul Col­lier, Dambisa Moyo, Mia Far­row, John Bolton’s, etc. opin­ions all in one place. All of them are extremely influ­en­tial and respected indi­vid­u­als in their respec­tive fields and it’s a one stop/click/video for amaz­ing insights into dif­fer­ent top­ics. It also enables you to see their posi­tions on cer­tain top­ics, which would help you greatly in terms of referring/researching on a topic/individual should you want to inves­ti­gate in more depth their pub­li­ca­tions and opinions.

    3) COMMENT on your position

    For a cer­tain period after the debates, an online pol­ing sta­tion (open to a ran­dom selct group of Cana­dian pan­elist) and medi­ated forum (open to the gen­eral pub­lic) is set up. You get to see and com­ment on an ‘opin­ions forum’, and some­times you find some of the most amaz­ing ideas and posi­tions that the pub­lic has taken on it. A data analy­sis is also run based on the online pol­ing sta­tion and you can see the break­down of opin­ion on the debate topic as well as the key points that are brought up dur­ing the debate.

    In other words, you watch the debates, com­ment, and view stats. Love it.

    ***
    Past debate topics:

    ***

    ***

    ***

    Some future debate topic lineups:

    Reli­gion is a force of good in the world

    More Free mar­ket and less gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tion is the answer to our eco­nomic woes

    Final thoughts: Ranked: 9/10. Improve­ment: Bet­ter adver­tis­ing. I only found this after nav­i­gat­ing heav­ily through the Globe and Mail.

    Note: All pic­tures are taken from http://www.munkdebates.com

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel